Comments for JumpFox - San Francisco iPhone Application Development http://jumpfox.com San Francisco iPhone Application Development Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:35:48 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 Comment on 4iThumbs: 4 Thumbs Up by gerald rosengarten http://jumpfox.com/2009/12/04/4ithumbs-4-thumbs-up/comment-page-1/#comment-14 gerald rosengarten Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:35:48 +0000 http://jumpfox.com/?p=96#comment-14 First of all we are not an Apple product. My team and I created 4ithumbs to help people type faster on the iphone, without looking (for the experts). Understand even with our screen protector keypad you can use all the functions (apps) of the phone without taking 4iThumbs off. I am counting on it being a success. First of all we are not an Apple product. My team and I created 4ithumbs to help people type faster on the iphone, without looking (for the experts). Understand even with our screen protector keypad you can use all the functions (apps) of the phone without taking 4iThumbs off. I am counting on it being a success.

]]> Comment on 4iThumbs: 4 Thumbs Up by Esther Koo http://jumpfox.com/2009/12/04/4ithumbs-4-thumbs-up/comment-page-1/#comment-13 Esther Koo Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:29:47 +0000 http://jumpfox.com/?p=96#comment-13 Hi Mark, Thanks so much for your post on 4iThumbs. Just wanted to clarify that 4iThumbs is a separate company that launched the typing guide for the iPhone--the typing guide was not launched by Apple. For more information, please visit www.4ithumbs.com. Thanks! Hi Mark,

Thanks so much for your post on 4iThumbs. Just wanted to clarify that 4iThumbs is a separate company that launched the typing guide for the iPhone–the typing guide was not launched by Apple.

For more information, please visit http://www.4ithumbs.com.

Thanks!

]]> Comment on Background Processing on the Apple iPhone? by Harbmaster http://jumpfox.com/2009/10/15/background-processing-on-the-apple-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-9 Harbmaster Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:10:05 +0000 http://jumpfox.com/?p=22#comment-9 Well that seems real possible but I thought the Nike app used Bluetooth to connect, I mean if their is a chip already in here thaw awesome and wouldn't be the first time apple added technology to their devices and didn't allow it any use, iPod touch before 3.0 with Bluetooth, but I'll be content for now being able to background process with apple only apps if they make the radio app, you can use iPod with pretty much everything and chances are they will implement the radio app into the iPod app, that seems more reasonable to make the iPhone still have that ease of use otherwise the radio app might not have the possibility to run in the background. Apple should consider focusing on allowing multitaskig on the iPhone, even though they want the ease of use of the iPhone so many people have thought of soany ideas and though apple wants the phone to be easy to use, the iPhone is way to simple that many business people have used harder technology like the blackberry and still think that is so easy to use. Being easy to use is necessarily about limiting the options the phone can do but about how the os can do alot of things with ease, background processing is easy to implement along with push notification, battery life is the problem but everyone with an iPhone knows th more apps you have running the shorter you battery life is, the more apple adds to the iPhone the less the people will jailbreak, I used to jailbreak my iPhone to get so many cool features but when 3.0 was released I tried it without jailbreaking. It was amazing but I still need that background processing and the ability to reply to a message from with in apps, if apple is set on not having background process than they should at least allow iPhone to have message within an app and a btter notificaton system, you have the whole iPhone community asking you to do this apple it shouldn't have to be a year till we get a phone that can do hat your competitiora have ben doing, by the time apple adds in multitasking, other companies will be fixing the way the phone does background processing which means that it will never be as good as any other phone Well that seems real possible but I thought the Nike app used Bluetooth to connect, I mean if their is a chip already in here thaw awesome and wouldn’t be the first time apple added technology to their devices and didn’t allow it any use, iPod touch before 3.0 with Bluetooth, but I’ll be content for now being able to background process with apple only apps if they make the radio app, you can use iPod with pretty much everything and chances are they will implement the radio app into the iPod app, that seems more reasonable to make the iPhone still have that ease of use otherwise the radio app might not have the possibility to run in the background. Apple should consider focusing on allowing multitaskig on the iPhone, even though they want the ease of use of the iPhone so many people have thought of soany ideas and though apple wants the phone to be easy to use, the iPhone is way to simple that many business people have used harder technology like the blackberry and still think that is so easy to use. Being easy to use is necessarily about limiting the options the phone can do but about how the os can do alot of things with ease, background processing is easy to implement along with push notification, battery life is the problem but everyone with an iPhone knows th more apps you have running the shorter you battery life is, the more apple adds to the iPhone the less the people will jailbreak, I used to jailbreak my iPhone to get so many cool features but when 3.0 was released I tried it without jailbreaking. It was amazing but I still need that background processing and the ability to reply to a message from with in apps, if apple is set on not having background process than they should at least allow iPhone to have message within an app and a btter notificaton system, you have the whole iPhone community asking you to do this apple it shouldn’t have to be a year till we get a phone that can do hat your competitiora have ben doing, by the time apple adds in multitasking, other companies will be fixing the way the phone does background processing which means that it will never be as good as any other phone

]]> Comment on Breaking: In-App Purchases for Free Apps, Still Some Limitations… by Tweets that mention Breaking: In-App Purchases for Free Apps, Still Some Limitations… | JumpFox - San Francisco iPhone Application Development -- Topsy.com http://jumpfox.com/2009/10/15/breaking-in-app-purchases-for-free-apps-still-some-limitations/comment-page-1/#comment-4 Tweets that mention Breaking: In-App Purchases for Free Apps, Still Some Limitations… | JumpFox - San Francisco iPhone Application Development -- Topsy.com Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:58:23 +0000 http://jumpfox.com/?p=42#comment-4 [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by william kasel, william kasel. william kasel said: RT @jumpfox: Breaking: In-App Purchases for Free Apps, Still Some Limitations... - http://bit.ly/1eQrVu [...] [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by william kasel, william kasel. william kasel said: RT @jumpfox: Breaking: In-App Purchases for Free Apps, Still Some Limitations… – http://bit.ly/1eQrVu [...]

]]> Comment on Breaking: In-App Purchases for Free Apps, Still Some Limitations… by William Kasel http://jumpfox.com/2009/10/15/breaking-in-app-purchases-for-free-apps-still-some-limitations/comment-page-1/#comment-3 William Kasel Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:24:52 +0000 http://jumpfox.com/?p=42#comment-3 This means a lot to the Development Community! This means a lot to the Development Community!

]]> Comment on Background Processing on the Apple iPhone? by William Kasel http://jumpfox.com/2009/10/15/background-processing-on-the-apple-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-2 William Kasel Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:18:02 +0000 http://jumpfox.com/?p=22#comment-2 Testing out the new JumpFox Blog! Testing out the new JumpFox Blog!

]]>